Theory of regional stability as a public good: Examples from Southern Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.4.2.6Keywords:
Regional public goods, stabilityAbstract
The article examines the interaction of countries in the same region when making efforts to achieve stability. The leader in regional initiatives that foster stability is likely to be the most vulnerable member of the region because in the event of regional instability, the leader member will experience the most detrimental effects. The analysis identifies a key factor - cost comparison - that determines counter-regional instability cost allocations. It is shown that market failures associated with crisis prevention and solving regional instability may be jointly reduced by a vulnerable member. Nevertheless, the subgame perfect equilibrium will still be suboptimal due to leaders who do not internalize the full externalities. Because of the high costs associated with a leader member, she is likely to be the first mover in the game of providing stability, the regional public good, giving its neighbors the opportunity to free-ride.References
Arce, M. and T. Sandler. 2002. “A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Global and Transnational Public Goods for Health.” Fiscal Studies. Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 196-222.
Bandayopadhyay, S. and T. Sandler. 2009. “The Interplay between Preemptive and Defense Counterterrorism Measures: A Two-Stage Game.” 28 April 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1279536.
Cook, L.D. and J. Sachs. 1999. “Regional Public Goods in International Assistance,” pp. 436-449 in I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M. Stern, eds. International Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
Estervadeordal, A., B. Frantz, T.R. Nguyen, eds. 2004. Regional Public Goods: From Theory to Practice. Washington, D.C: Inter-American Development Bank and Asian Development Bank.
James, P. and D. Goetze. 2001. Evolutional Theory and Ethnic Conflict. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Mascarenhas, R. and T. Sandler. 2005. “Donor’s Mechanisms for Financing International and National Public Goods: Loans or Grants?” World Economy . Vol. 28, No. 8, pp. 1095-1117.
Morgan, J. 2000. “Financing Public Goods by Means of Lotteries.” Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 37, pp. 761-784.
Murdoch, J.C. and T. Sandler. 2002. “Civil Wars and Economic Growth: A Regional Comparison.” Defense and Peace Economics. Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 451-464.
Murdoch, J.C. and T. Sandler. 2002. “Economic growth, Civil Wars, and Spatial Spillovers.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 91-110.
Sandler, T. 1998. “Global and Regional Public Goods: A Prognosis for Collective Action.” Fiscal Studies. Vol. 19, pp. 221-247.
Sandler, T. 2002. “On Financing Global and International Publish Goods,” pp. 81-117 in M. Ferroni and A. Mody, eds. International Public Goods: Incentives Measurement, and Financing. Dordecht: Kluwer.
Sandler, T. 2005. “Regional Public Goods and International Organization.” Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California (unpublished manuscript).
Stalgren, P. 2000. “Regional Public Goods and the Future of International Development Cooperation: A review of Literature.” Working Paper 2002:2. Expert Group on Development Issues. Ministry for Foreign Affairs. Stockholm, Sweden.
te Velde, D.W., O. Morrisey, and A. Hewitt. 2002. “Allocating Aid to International Public Goods: An Empirical Analysis by Donor and Sector,” pp. 119-156 in M. Ferroni and A. Mody, eds. International Public Goods: Incentives Measurement, and Financing. Dordecht: Kluwer.
Vicary, T. and T. Sandler. 2000. “Weakest-link Public Goods: Giving In-kind or Transferring Money.” European Economic Review. Vol. 46, pp. 1501-1520.
Wallenstein, P. and M. Sollenberg. 2001. “Armed Conflict, 1989-2000.” Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 629-644.
