Transnational threats and security in the Americas: Patterns, contradictions, and more
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.2.2.69Abstract
The article examines conflict patterns in Latin America since the second half of the twentieth century. It seems paradoxical that the region is one of the most peaceful in terms of interstate conflicts while contending with numerous domestic crises. The article first examines the peace studies literature and argues that neither the micro, macro, or more recent meso approach fits the Latin American experience well. Instead, a different approach proposes incorporating the effects of transnationalism, especially of transnational security concerns, into any consideration of peace in the region. Transnational threat perception diverts attention, suggests the need to handle a common enemy, increases the cost of fighting a conventional war, and involves issue-linkages. These factors along with the traditional absence of ethnic rivalries and the presence of international actors sustain the long peace in Latin America.References
Axelrod, R. 1977. The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bailey, J. and L. Dammert. 2005. Public Security and Police Reform in the Americas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Carey, J.M. 2003. “Presidentialism and Representative Institutions,” pp. 11-42 in J. Dominguez and M. Shifter, eds. Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America. 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cashman, G. 1993. What Causes War? New York: Lexington Books.
Colombia. 1999. Colombia: Plan for Peace, Prosperity, and the Strengthening of the State. Bogota, Colombia: Presidency of the Republic. See U.S. Institute of Peace: http://www.usip.org/library/pa/colombia/adddoc/plan_colombia_101999.html
Dilthey, W. 1962. Patterns and Meaning in History. New York: Harper and Row.
Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hass, E. 1980. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.” World Politics Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 207-243.
Hobbes, T. 1931. Leviathan. London: J.M. Dent and Sons.
Holsti, O. 1987. “Theories of Crises Decision-Making,” pp. 244-281 in P. Viotti and M. Kauppi, eds. International Relations Theory. NewYork: Macmillan.
[IADB] Inter-American Defense Board. http://www.jid.org.
International Herald Tribune. “Crime Hurts Latin America GDP.” Online edition. See http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/10/17/business/crime.php.
Katznelson, I. and K. Prewitt. 1979. “Constitutionalism, Class, and the Limits of Choice in U.S. Foreign Policy” pp. 25-40 in R. Fagen, ed. Capitalism and the State in U.S.-Latin American Relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Keohane, R.O. and J.S. Nye, Jr. 2000. “Realism and Complex Interdependence,” pp. 718-731 in A. Linklater, ed. International Relations. Critical Concepts in Political Sciences. New York: Routledge.
Kohl, J. and J. Litt. 1974. Urban Guerrilla Warfare in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Linz, J. and A. de Miguel. 1966. “Within Nation Differences and Comparisons: The Eight Spains,” pp. 267-319 in R.L. Merrit and S. Rokkan, eds. Comparing Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mares, D. 2000. “Securing Peace in the Americas in the Next Decade,” pp. 35-48 in J. Dominguez, ed. The Future of Inter-American Relations. New York: Routledge.
Martin, F.E. 2006. Militarist Peace in South America. Conditions for War and Peace. New York: Palgrave.
McSherry, P.J. 2005. Predatory States. Operation Condor and Covert War in Latin America. Lanham, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
Modelski, G. 1987. Long Cycles in World Politics. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
[OAS] Organization of American States. 2003. Declaration of Security in the Americas.
Polachek, S.W. and C. Seiglie. 2007. “Trade, Peace and Democracy: An Analysis of Dyadic Dispute,” pp. 1017-1073 in T. Sandler and K. Hartley, eds. Handbook of Defense Economics. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pumar, E.S. 1990. “Recent Trends in U.S. Economic Policy Towards Latin America,” pp. 403-421 in M. Mtewa, ed. International Development and Alternative Futures: The Coming Challenges.” New Delhi: Allied Press.
Russett, B. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shafer, D.M. 1988. Deadly Paradigms. The Failure of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schelling, T. 1984. “What Is Game Theory?” pp. 312-242 in T. Schelling. Choice and Consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmookler, A.B. 1984. The Parable of the Tribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Smith, P.H. 2005. Democracy in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stinchcombe, A.L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
[UNDP] United Nations Development Program. 2006. Human Development Report 2005. http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2005/.
[UNODC] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2007. UNODC Annual Report 2007. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/annual_report_2007.html.
[USAID] United States Agency for International Development. 2007. Latin America and the Caribbean. Development Statistics. http://qesdb.usaid.gov/lac/index.html.
United States Department of State. 2004. Sixth Conference of the Ministers of Defense of the Americas: Declaration of Quito. http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rls/71006.htm.
Waltz, K. 1979. The Theory of International Relations. Boston. Addison-Wesley.
