Governing Defense Procurement: Strengthening the EU’s Defense Technological & Industrial Base
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.18.1.35Keywords:
EDTIB, Defense procurement, Foreign Subsidies Regulation, Third country suppliersAbstract
The regulatory framework concerning defense procurement has evolved considerably since the start of the millennium. In addition to the general Public Procurement Directive and the Defense Procurement Directive, the European Commission recently formulated a proposal for a Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR). Nonetheless, defense sector particularities continue to produce tensions in public procurement, and significant blind spots remain.
In view of policy objectives to strengthen the European Defense Technological & Industrial Base (EDTIB), it is necessary to first study the current state of EU defense procurement. To that end, we perform an analysis of 14,207 EU27-tenders spanning the period 2009-2020. In addition, a case study approach investigates six tender procedures by the Belgian military, establishing material points of note.
Key insights include: (1) the number of defense procurement procedures won by third country bidders is limited, (2) tenders won by non-EU27-tenderers are larger and less competitive on average, and (3) an overly strong focus on price efficiency in public procurement award procedures inhibits attaining EDTIB goals. In short, the data shows a chasm between stated policy aims of strengthening the EDTIB through positive action in public procurement, on the one hand, and public procurement practices, on the other.
References
Agoria (2020). De veiligheids-en defensie-industrie, een sleutelsector voor het herstel van de Belgische economie (Website). Available at: https://www.agoria.be/nl/over-ons/agoria-news/federaal/de-veiligheids-en-defensie-industrie-een-sleutelsector-voor-het-herstel-van-de-belgische-economie (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
Arrowsmith, S., 2017. EC regime on public procurement. In: Thai, K. V. ed., International handbook of public procurement. Routledge, pp. 251–290.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315092539
Belgian Defense (2020a). MRMP-L/A-20LA313-F17 (Tender documents). Available at: https://enot.publicprocurement.be/enot-war/preViewNotice.do?noticeId=382480 (Accessed: 18 April 2022).
Belgian Defense (2020b). MRMP-I/A-20IA472-F02 (Tender documents). Available at: http://bit.ly/4017p4e (Accessed: 18 April 2022).
Belgian Defense (2020c). MRMP-I/A-20IA463-F03 (Tender documents). Available at: http://bit.ly/3mo1b0q (Accessed: 18 April 2022).
Belgian Defense (2020d). MRMP-C/S-19CSC01-F03 (Tender documents). Available at: http://bit.ly/43gjAge (Accessed: 18 April 2022).
Belgian Defense (2020e). MRMP-L/A-19LA314-F18 (Tender documents). Available at: http://bit.ly/3MwbNoL (Accessed: 18 April 2022).
Belgian Defense (2020f). MRMP-L/S-19LS112bis-F03 (Tender documents). Available at: http://bit.ly/43qFr4y (Accessed: 18 April 2022).
Bellais, R. and Fiott, D., 2017. The European defense market: Disruptive innovation and market destabilization. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 12(1), p. 1. Available at: https://www.epsjournal.org.uk/index.php/EPSJ/article/view/287
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.12.1.37
Bellais, R., Foucault, M. and J. Oudot. 2014. Économie de la défense. La Découverte.
https://doi.org/10.3917/dec.bella.2014.01
Blauberger, M. and Kramer, R., 2010. European competition vs. global competitiveness: transferring EU rules on state aid and public procurement beyond Europe (ESRC Centre for Competition Policy working paper). [online] Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1656961 (Accessed 12 August 2022).
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656961
Baumol, W. J., 1982. Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. American Economic Review, 72(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/Baumol-contestableMkts.pdf
Bowen, G. A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal 9(2), pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Burnett, M., 2015. The New Rules for Competitive Dialogue and the Competitive Procedure with Negotiation in Directive 2014/24—What Might They Mean for PPP. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review (EPPPL), 10(2), pp. 62–71. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26639575
Carroll, R. J. and Schneider, H., 1985. A note on levene’s tests for equality of variances. Statistics & Probability Letters, 3(4), pp. 191–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7152(85)90016-1
Chever, L., Saussier, S. and Yvrande-Billon, A., 2017. The law of small numbers: investigating the benefits of restricted auctions for public procurement. Applied Economics, 49(42), pp. 4241–4260. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1279270
Council of the European Union (2022). A Strategic Compass for a stronger EU security and defence in the next decade (Press release). Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/03/21/a-strategic-compass-for-a-stronger-eu-security-and-defence-in-the-next-decade/ (Accessed 31 August 2022).
Czibik, Á., Fazekas, M., Sanchez, A. H. and Wachs, J., 2021. Networked Corruption Risks in European Defense Procurement. In : Granados, O. M. and Nicolás-Carlock, J. R. Red., Corruption Networks: Concepts and Applications, Springer International Publishing, pp. 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81484-7_5
De France, O., Mampaey, L. and Zandee, D., 2016. Defence industrial policy in Belgium and the Netherlands (Armament Industry European Research Group report). [online] Available at: https://www.iris-france.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Policy-Paper-Defence-Policy-Belgium-NL-October-2016.pdf (Accessed 21 August 2022).
Defence Institute (2021). Actualisering van de Strategische Visie 2030: Aanbevelingen (Report). Available at: https://www.defence-institute.be/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/200622-Strategic-Vision-2021-NL.pdf (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
DIGIWHIST (n.d.). D2.4 Raw Data (Research note). [online] Available at: http://digiwhist.eu/publications/raw-data/ 26/10/2020 (Accessed 31 August 2022).
‘Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC’ (2014) Official Journal of the European Union L94, pp. 65–242.
‘Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security, and amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC’ (2009) Official Journal of the European Union L216, pp. 76–136.
Dunne, J. P. (1995). Chapter 14 The defense industrial base. In Handbook of Defense Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 399–430). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0013(05)80016-X
European Commission (2022a). Commission unveils significant actions to contribute to European Defence, boost innovation and address strategic dependencies (Press release). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_924 (Accessed: 31 August 2022).
European Commission (2022b). Defence industry: EU to reinforce the European defence industry through common procurement with a EUR 500 million instrument (Press release). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_4491 (Accessed: 30 August 2022).
European Commission (2020c). Foreign subsidies (Website). Available at: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/international/foreign-subsidies_en (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
European Commission (2022d). Thresholds (Website). Available at: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/public-procurement/legal-rules-and-implementation/thresholds_en (Accessed: 28 August 2022).
European Commission (2022e). Foreign subsidies (Website). Available at: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/international/foreign-subsidies_en (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
European Commission (2022f). EU steps up action to strengthen EU defence capabilities, industrial and technological base: towards an EU framework for Joint defence procurement (Press release). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_3143 (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
European Commission (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market (Legislative proposal). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/international/overview/proposal_for_regulation.pdf (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
European External Action Service (2022). Europe in the Interregnum: our geopolitical awakening after Ukraine (Statement). Available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/europe-interregnum-our-geopolitical-awakening-after-ukraine_en (Accessed: 20 August 2022).
European Parliament (2022a). The EU’s Defence Technological and Industrial Base (In-depth analysis). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_IDA(2020)603483 (Accessed: 23 August 2022).
European Parliament (2022b). Provisional agreement resulting from interinstitutional negotiations: Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market (European Parliament report). Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COMMITTEES/INTA/DV/2022/07-13/1260231_EN.pdf (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
Federal Public Service for Policy and Support & Federal Public Service Chancellery of the Prime Minister. (2014). Welkom op publicprocurement.be (Website). Available at: https://www.publicprocurement.be/nl (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
Federal Public Service for Policy and Support. (2022a). Wat is e-Notification? (Website). Available at: https://enot.publicprocurement.be/enot-war/viewStaticData.do?staticDataId=3 (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
Federal Public Service for Policy and Support. (2022b). Bekendmakingen zoeken (Data). Available at: http://bit.ly/3Kr2RhS (Accessed: 16 August 2022).
Finkbeiner, A. and Van Noorden, R., 2022. Will war in Ukraine mark a new era for European defence research? Nature, 608(8146), pp. 466–467.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-02185-x.
Gereffi, G. and Lee, J., 2012. Why the World Suddenly Cares About Global Supply Chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3), pp. 24–32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2012.03271.x
Gourdon, J. and Messent, J., 2019. How government procurement measures can affect trade. Journal of World Trade, 53(5). https://doi.org/10.1787/d1ab07b8-en.
Hartley, K. 2020. Defence Economics: Achievements and Challenges (Elements in Defence Economics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108887243
Hoekman, B. and Taş, B. K. O., 2022. Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Business Economics, 58(1), pp. 383–402.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00414-z.
Hornkohl, L., 2022. The EU Foreign Subsidy Regulation–What, Why and How? In: J. Hillebrand Pohl, S. Warchol, G. Papadopoulos, & Wiesenthal (Eds.), The Investment Weapon-Studies on the Law and Geo-economics of Foreign Investment Controls dedicated to Steffen Hindelang. Forthcoming. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4172808.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4172808
Laguerre, C., 2009. Is the Defence Market Contestable? The Case of Military Aerospace. Defence and Peace Economics, 20(4), pp. 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690802365044
Leuffen, D., 2007. Case Selection and Selection Bias in Small-n Research. In: T. Gschwend & F. Schimmelfennig (Eds.), Research Design in Political Science: How to Practice What They Preach. Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 145–160.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598881_8
Luja, R., 2021. The Foreign Subsidies Regulation: Countering State Aid Beyond the European Union. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 20(2), pp. 187–199.
https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2021/2/3
Mardas, D. and Triantafyllou, D., 1997. Selection criteria and the award procedure in public procurement. International Advances in Economic Research, 3(1), pp. 91–112.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295004
Matthews, R. and Al-Saadi, R., 2021. Organisational Complexity of the Eurofighter Typhoon Collaborative Supply Chain. Defence and Peace Economics, pp. 1–16.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2021.1987022
Mbah, R.E. and Wasum, D., 2022. Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A Review of the Economic Impact of Russian-Ukraine Crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(3), pp.144-153.
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.93.12005.
Meershoek, N., 2021. The Constraints of Power Structures on EU Integration and Regulation of Military Procurement. European Papers, 6(1), pp. 831–868.
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/489
Miller, D. B., 2009. Is It Time to Reform Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreements. Public Contract Law Journal, 39, p. 93. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25755753
Mitran, D., 2013. Improving access of SMEs to the public procurement markets. Internal Auditing and Risk Management, 8(2), pp.244–251. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ath/journl/v30y2013i1p265-272.html.
Moosavi, J., Fathollahi-Fard, A.M. and Dulebenets, M.A., 2022. Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 75, 102983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102983
OpenTender.eu (2022a). All data (Database). [Online] Available at: https://opentender.eu/all/download (Accessed: 12 May 2020).
‘Regulation (EC) No 2195/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 on the Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) (Text with EEA relevance)’ (2002) Official Journal of the European Union L340, pp. 1–562.
Roth, A. 2017. The size and location of Europe’s defence industry (Bruegel blog post). [Online] Available at: https://www.bruegel.org/blog-post/size-and-location-europes-defence-industry (Accessed: 21 August 2022).
Telles, P. and Butler, L., 2014. Public Procurement Award Procedures in Directive 2014/24/EU. In: Lichère, F., Caranta, R. and Treumer, S. eds., Modernising Public Procurement: The New Directive. Djøf Copenhagen, pp. 131–184. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2443438 (Accessed: 14 February 2023).
Terpan, F. and Saurugger, S., 2019. Assessing judicial activism of the CJEU the case of the court’s defence procurement rulings. Journal of European Integration, 41(4), pp.543-561.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1537268
Thomson, R., 2010. Opposition through the back door in the transposition of EU directives. European Union Politics, 11(4), pp. 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510380283
Trybus, M., 2014. The Promotion of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Public Procurement: A Strategic Objective of the New Public Sector Directive? In: Lichère, F., Caranta, R. and Treumer, S. eds., Modernising Public Procurement: The New Directive. Djøf Copenhagen, pp. 255–280.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2860019
Trybus, M. and Andrecka, M., 2017. Favouring Small and Medium Sized Enterprises with Directive 2014/24/EU? European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 12(3), pp. 224–238.
https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2017/3/6
Unizo (2021). Economisch belang van KMO’s (Report). Available at: https://www.unizo.be/sites/default/files/2107_economischebelangkmos2021.pdf (Accessed: 19 December 2022).
Viaene, H., Van der Putten, K. and Wiame, H., 2022. EU Foreign Subsidies Regulation to impact EU and cross-border M&A antitrust review starting in 2023 (McDermott Will & Emery blog post). [online] Available at: https://www.mwe.com/insights/eu-foreign-subsidies-regulation-to-impact-eu-and-cross-border-ma-antitrust-review-starting-in-2023/ (Accessed: 18 August 2022).
Weiner, K., 2011. Towards European Preferences—Implications of Directive 2009/81/EC on Domestic Preferences in Defense Procurement. Procurement Lawyer, 47(3), pp. 16–24. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/procurlw47&div=24&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals.
Wilcox, R.R., 2003. Chapter 9 - One-way ANOVA. In: Wilcox, R.R. ed., Applying Contemporary Statistical Techniques, Academic Press, pp. 285–328.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012751541-0/50030-4
Yukins, C.R., 2009. The European Defense Procurement Directive: An American Perspective. The Government Contractor, 51(41), p. 383. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1502858.
