Accounting for Numbers: Group Characteristics and the Choice of Violent and Nonviolent Tactics

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Marianne Dahl, Scott Gates, Belen Gonzalez

Abstract


Scholars have shown that nonviolent movements tend to be more successful than violent movements. A key explanation is that nonviolent movements have a mobilization advantage over violent campaigns. As nonviolent movements have lower barriers to active participation, they can expand quickly by mobilizing much larger numbers than violent movements. We argue that such a mobilization advantage is not universal, and that different movements are likely to have a comparative advantage in one tactic over another. We develop a simple model emphasizing how the ex ante potential for mobilization and prospects for success steer the choice of dissident tactics. Nonviolent tactics can be relatively more effective when a movement can mobilize more active participants than with violence, but movements with limited mobilization potential can have feasible prospects for violent dissent and a nonviolent mobilization disadvantage. We examine the implications of the model against empirical data for different types of dissident tactics and on resort to nonviolent and nonviolent dissent. We demonstrate very different actor profiles in nonviolent dissent and violent conflict, and show how each of the two types of dissent are more likely under very different settings. To compare success by types of dissent we must account for how differences in potential numbers or mobilization shape tactical choices.


Keywords


Mobilization; tactics; nonviolence; violence

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Alesina, A. and E. Spolaore. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. https://doi.org//10.7551/mitpress/6261.001.0001

Arreguin-Toft, I. 2001. How the weak win wars: A theory of asymmetric conflict. International https://doi.org///10.1162/016228801753212868

Security, 26(1), pp.93-128.

Bapat, N.A. 2005. Insurgency and the opening of peace processes. Journal of Peace Research 42(6), pp.699-71. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343305057888

Beardsley, K.C., K.S. Gleditsch and N. Lo. 2015. Roving and stationary bandits in African civil wars. International Studies Quarterly 59(3), pp.503-516. https://doi.org//10.1111/isqu.12196

Bhavnani, R. and S. Jha. 2014. Gandhi's gift: Lessons for peaceful reform from India's struggle for democracy. Economics of Peace and Security Journal 9(1), pp.76-88. https://doi.org//10.15355/epsj.9.1.76

Bond, D. 1994. Nonviolent direct action and the diffusion of power. In Justice Without Violence, P Wehr, H. Burgess and G. Burgess, eds. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner pp.59-79.

Boulding, K.E. 1963. Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York: Harper and Row.

Buhaug, H. 2006. Relative capability and rebel objective in civil war. Journal of Peace Research 43(6), pp.691-708. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343306069255

Buhaug, H. , L.-E.Cederman and K.S. Gleditsch. 2014. Square pegs in round holes: Inequalities, grievances, and civil war. International Studies Quarterly 58(2), pp.418-431. https://doi.org//10.1111/isqu.12068

Buhaug, H., S. Gates and P. Lujala. 2009. Geography, rebel capability, and the duration of civil conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53(4), pp.544-569. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002709336457

Burrowes, R.J. 1996. The Strategy of Nonviolence Defense: A Gandhian Approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Butler, C. and S. Gates. 2009. Asymmetry, Parity, and (Civil) War: Can international theories of power help us understand civil war? International Interactions 35 35(3), pp.330-340. https://doi.org//10.1080/03050620903084877

Cederman, L.-E., K.S. Gleditsch and H. Buhaug. 2013. Inequality, Grievances, and Civil War. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org//10.1017/CBO9781139084161

Chenoweth, E. and J. Ulfelder. 2017. Can structural conditions explain the onset of nonviolent uprisings? Journal of Conflict Resolution (2), pp.298-324. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002715576574

Chenoweth, E. and K.G. Cunningham. 2013. Understanding nonviolent resistance: An introduction. Journal of Peace Research 50(3), pp.271-276. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343313480381

Chenoweth, E. and M.J. Stephan. 2011. Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Chenoweth, E. and O.A Lewis. 2013. Unpacking nonviolent campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 dataset. Journal of Peace Research 50(3), pp.415-423. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343312471551

Collier, P., A. Hoeffler and D. Rohner. 2009. Beyond greed and grievance: Feasibility and civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 61:1-27. https://doi.org//10.1093/oep/gpn029

Corsun, A. 1992. Group profile: The revolutionary organization 17 November in Greece (1975-91). Terrorism 14(2), pp.93-126. https://doi.org//10.1080/10576109108435860

Cunningham, D.E., K.S. Gleditsch, B. González, D. Vidovic' and P.B.White. 2017. Words and deeds: From incompatibilities to outcomes in anti-government disputes. Journal of Peace Research 54(4), pp.468-483. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343317712576

Cunningham, D.E, K.S. Gleditsch and I. Salehyan. 2009. It takes two: A dyadic analysis of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53(4), pp.570-597. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002709336458

Cunningham, K.G. 2013. Understanding strategic choice: The determinants of civil war and nonviolent campaign in self-determination disputes. Journal of Peace Research 50(3), pp.291-304. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343313475467

Cunningham, K.G. 2014. Inside the Politics of Self-determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org//10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199364909.001.0001

Cunningham, K. Gallagher, M. Dahl and A. Frugé. 2017. Strategies of resistance: Diversification and diffusion. American Journal of Political Science 61(3), pp.591-605. https://doi.org//10.1111/ajps.12304

Cunningham, K. Gallagher., M. Dahl and A. Frugé. 2020. Introducing the strategies of resistance data project. Journal of Peace Research, 57(3), pp.482-491. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343319880246

Danneman, N. and E.H. Ritter. 2014. Contagious rebellion and preemptive repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58(2), pp.254-279. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002712468720

DeNardo, J. 1985. Power in Numbers: The Political strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org//10.1515/9781400855025

Enders, W. and T. Sandler. 1996. Terrorism and foreign direct investment in Spain and Greece. Kyklos 49(3), pp.331-352. https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-6435.1996.tb01400.x

Fearon, J.D. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49(3), pp.379-379. https://doi.org//10.1017/S0020818300033324

Fearon, J.D and D.D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review 97(1), pp.75-90. https://doi.org//10.1017/S0003055403000534

García-Ponce, O. and L. Wantchékon. 2020. Critical junctures: Independence movements and democracy in Africa. Working Paper. Available at:

http://omargarciaponce.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/critical_junctures_may_2017.pdf

Gates, S. 2002. Recruitment and allegiance: The microfoundations of rebellion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1), pp.111-130. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002702046001007

Geddes, B, J. Wright and E. Frantz. 2018. How Dictatorships Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org//10.1017/9781316336182

Gleditsch, K.S.. 2002. Expanded trade and GDP data, 1946-99. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(5), pp.712-724. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002702046005006

Gleditsch, K.S. and M. Rivera. 2017. The diffusion of non-violent campaigns. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(5), pp.1120-1145. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002715603101

Gleditsch, N.P., P. Wallensteen, M. Erikson, M. Sollenberg and H. Strand. 2002. Armed conflict, 1945-99: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39(5), pp.615-637. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343302039005007

Haines, H.H. 1988. Black Radicals and the Civil Rights Mainstream,1954-1970. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.

Hallberg, J.D. 2012. PRIO conflict sites 1989-2008: A geo-referenced dataset on armed conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 29(2), pp.219-232. https://doi.org//10.1177/0738894211433168

Hao, Y. 2000. Tibetan population in China: Myths and facts re-examined. Asian Ethnicity 1(1), pp.11-36. https://doi.org//10.1080/146313600115054

Hirshleifer, J. 1988. The analytics of continuing conflict. Synthese 76(2), pp.201-233. https://doi.org//10.1007/BF00869589

Jaggers, K. and T.R. Gurr. 1995. Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32(4), pp.469-482. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343395032004007

Koos, C. 2016. Does violence pay? The effect of ethnic rebellion on overcoming political deprivation. Conflict Management and Peace Science 33(1), pp.3-24. https://doi.org//10.1177/0738894214559670

Kreutz, J. 2015. The war that wasn't there: Managing unclear cases in conflict data. Journal of Peace Research 52(1), pp.120-124. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343314541845

Kuran, T. 1989. Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice 61(1), pp.41-74. https://doi.org//10.1007/BF00116762

LaFree, G. and L. Dugan. 2007. Introducing the global terrorism database. Terrorism and Political Violence 19(2), pp.181-204. https://doi.org//10.1080/09546550701246817

Lichbach, M.I. 1987. Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution 31(2), pp.266-297. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002787031002003

McCarthy, J.D. and M.N. Zald. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology 82(6), pp.1212-1241. https://doi.org//10.1086/226464

Most, B.A. and H. Starr. 1989. Inquiry, Logic, and International Politics. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

Muller, E.N. and E. Weede. 1990. Cross-national variation in political violence: A rational action approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution 34(4), pp.624-651. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002790034004003

Nardulli, P.F., S.L. Althaus and M. Hayes. 2015. A progressive supervised-learning approach to generating rich civil strife data. Sociological Methodology 45(1), pp.148-183. https://doi.org//10.1177/0081175015581378

Nepstad, S.E. 2011. Nonviolent Revolutions: Civil Resistance in the Late Twentieth Century. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org//10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778201.001.0001

Nepstad, S.E. 2013. Mutiny and nonviolence in the Arab spring: Exploring military defections and loyalty in Egypt, Bahrain, and Syria. Journal of Peace Research 50(3), pp.337-349. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343313476529

Powell, J. and C. Thyne. 2011. Global instances of coups from 1950-present. Journal of Peace Research 48(2), pp.249-259. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343310397436

Regan, P.M. and D. Norton. 2005. Greed, grievance, and mobilization in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(3), pp.319-336. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022002704273441

Rivera, M. and K.S. Gleditsch. 2013. Fresh carnations or all thorn, no rose? Nonviolent campaigns and transitions in autocracies. Journal of Peace Research 50(3), pp.385-400. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343312469979

Sandler, T, J.T. Tschirhart and J. Cauley. 1983. A theoretical analysis of transnational terrorism. American Political Science Review 77(1), pp.36-54. https://doi.org//10.2307/1956010

Schock, K. 2005. Unarmed Insurrection. People Power Movements in Nondemocracies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Schock, K. 2013. The practice and study of civil resistance. Journal of Peace Research 50(3), pp.277-290. https://doi.org//10.1177/0022343313476530

Sharp, Gene. 1973. The Politics of Nonviolent Action. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent.

Sobek, D. and C.L. Payne. 2010. A tale of two types: Rebel goals and the onset of civil wars. International Studies Quarterly 54(1), pp.213-240. https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00584.x

Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thyne, C.L. 2006. ABC's, 123's, and the golden rule: The pacifying effect of education on civil war, 1980-1999. International Studies Quarterly 50(4), pp.733-754. https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00423.x

Wehr, P., H. Burgess and G. Burgess. 1994. Justice Without Violence. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

White, P., D. Vidovic, B. González, K.S. Gleditsch and D.E. Cunningham. 2015. Nonviolence as a weapon of the resourceful: From claims to tactics in mobilization. Mobilization: An International Journal 20(4), pp.471-491. https://doi.org//10.17813/1086-671X-20-4-471

Wucherpfennig, J., N.W. Metternich, L.-E. Cederman and K.S. Gleditsch. 2012. Ethnicity, the state, and the duration of civil war. World Politics 64(1), pp.79-115. https://doi.org//10.1017/S004388711100030X




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15355/epsj.16.1.5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.