Strategic choices by the incumbent and challenger during revolution and civil war
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.15.1.58Keywords:
Revolution, civil war, fighting, accommodation, incumbent, challenger, game, conflictAbstract
A game is developed where an incumbent chooses between benefits provision to the population, which decreases the probability of revolution endogenously, and fighting with a challenger. Thereafter the challenger chooses a degree of fighting, which determines rent sharing. A successful revolution enables the challenger to replace the incumbent. An unsuccessful revolution preserves the status quo, or causes standoff or coalition. The four possibilities of incumbent replacement, status quo, standoff, or coalition combine with the incumbent either repressing (providing benefits below a threshold) or accommodating (providing benefits above a threshold) the population, for a total of eight outcomes. Such a rich conceptualization of eight outcomes of civil war is missing in the literature. We show how an advantaged versus disadvantaged incumbent deters or fights with a challenger, and provides versus does not provide benefits to the population. The eight outcomes are mapped to 87 revolutions 1961-2011.
References
Besley, T. and T. Persson. 2010. “State Capacity, Conflict, and Development.” Econometrica. Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA8073
Besley, T. and T. Persson. 2011. “The Logic of Political Violence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 126, No.3, pp. 1411-1445. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr025
Dixit, A. 1987. “Strategic Behavior in Contests.” American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 891-898.
Esteban, J., M. Morelli, and D. Rohner. 2015. “Strategic Mass Killings.” Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 123, No. 5, pp. 1087-1132. https://doi.org/10.1086/682584
Foran, J. 1993. “Theories of Revolution Revisited: Toward a Fourth Generation?” Sociological Theory. Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/201977
Hausken, K., and G. Levitin. 2012. “Review of Systems Defense and Attack Models.” International Journal of Performability Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 355-366.
Hausken, K., and M. Ncube. 2019. “The Incumbent, Challenger, and Population During Revolution and Civil War.” The Economics of Peace and Security Journal. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 32–41. https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.14.2.32
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Vol. 124). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Skaperdas, S. 1996. “Contest Success Functions.” Economic Theory. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050053
Tullock, G. 1971. “The Paradox of Revolution.” Public Choice. Vol 11, No. 1, pp. 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01726214
Tullock, G. 1974. The Social Dilemma: The Economics of War and Revolution. Blacksburg, VA: University Publications.
Tullock, G. 1980. “Efficient Rent-Seeking.” pp. 97-112 in J. M. Buchanan, R. D. Tollison, and G. Tullock, eds. Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A. and M. University Press.
