Honing the proper edge: CERP and the two-sided potential of military-led development in Afghanistan

Authors

  • Greg Adams Former practitioner, graduate of Harvard MPA in International Development program.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.10.2.53

Keywords:

Afghanistan, CERP, violence, military, SIGACTs

Abstract

Using a newer and expanded dataset as well as a survey of practitioner perceptions, this article adds to a recent body of literature on reconstruction and violence in Afghanistan. Data are taken from military-led development projects by way of the United States military’s Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP) and, to measure violence, from U.S. military Significant Activity reports. The results suggest that, at great cost, large-budget CERP efforts (those in excess of USD50,000 per project) are associated with an increase in violence and thus counter-productive to military stability goals. In contrast, small projects (below USD50,000), which comprise a smaller proportion of total CERP allocations, are associated in statistically significant ways with reductions in violence. To explore why CERP projects may have these effects, the article also examines administrative modalities for CERP spending. The results suggest that timely, flexible expenditure of CERP funds are most effective at reducing violence. [JEL codes: D74, O53]

Author Biography

Greg Adams, Former practitioner, graduate of Harvard MPA in International Development program.

Greg Adams is the CEO at Stabilitas, a company that is developing a platform for sharing security information across the globe in order to help NGOs, companies, and governments better react to and even prevent emergencies. He is a graduate of the Harvard’s MPA-International Development and MBA programs. He is also a former soldier that has deployed to Afghanistan and seen CERP used in the field.

References

Beath, A., F. Christia, and R. Enikolopov. 2012. “Winning Hearts and Minds through Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan.” MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2011-14. http://papers.ssrn.co/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1809677 [accessed 6 September 2015].

Beath, A., F. Christia, and R. Enikolopov. 2013. “Randomized Impact Evaluation of Afghanistan’s National Solidarity Program.” http://www.nsp-ie.org/reports/finalreport.pdf or http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/07/18273450/randomized-impact-evaluation-afghanistans-national-solidarity-programme [both accessed 6 September 2015].

Berman, E., J. Shapiro, and J. Felter. 2011. “Can Hearts and Minds Be Bought? The Economics of Counterinsurgency in Iraq.” Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 119, No. 4, pp. 766-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/661983

Berman, E., J. Felter, J. Shapiro, and E. Troland. 2013. “Modest, Secure, and Informed: Successful Development in Conflict Zones.” American Economic Review. Vol. 103, No. 3, pp. 512-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.512

Blattman, C. and E. Miguel. 2010. “Civil War.” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 3-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.3

[CALL] Center for Army Lessons Learned. 2008. Handbook: Commander’s Emergency Response Program.

[CALL] Center for Army Lessons Learned. 2009. Handbook: Commander’s Guide to Money as a Weapon System.

Chou, T. 2012. “Does Development Assistance Reduce Violence? Evidence From Afghanistan.” Economics of Peace and Security Journal. Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.15355/epsj.7.2.5

Child, T.B. 2014. “Hearts and Minds Cannot be Bought: Ineffective Reconstruction in Afghanistan.” Economics of Peace and Security Journal. Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 43-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.15355/epsj.9.2.43

Collier, Paul, Hoeffler, A., and Rohner, D. 2006, “Beyond Greed and Grievance: Feasibility and Civil War.” CSAE Working Paper 2006-10.

Fischerkeller, M. 2011. “The Premature Debate on CERP Effectiveness.” PRISM Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 139-150.

Galua, D. 1964. Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice. New York: Praeger.

Gentile, B. 2013. Wrong Turn: America’s Deadly Embrace of Counter-Insurgency Warfare. New York: The New Press.

[HQ, U.S. Army] Headquarters. Department of the Army. 2006a. FM 3-24 Counterinsurgency. Washington, D.C.

[HQ, U.S. Army] Headquarters. Department of the Army. 2006b. FM 3-05.40 Civil Affairs Operations. Washington, D.C.

[HQ, U.S. Army] Headquarters. Department of the Army. 2008. FM 3-07 Stability Operations. Washington, D.C.

Lyall, J. 2010. “JOISS Codebook: Version 1.1.” 1 February 2010. Available on request.

Nagl, J. 2002. Counterinsurgency Lessons from Malaya and Vietnam: Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife. Westport, CT: Praeger.

[SIGAR] Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. 2014. SIGAR-14-22-SP/CERP Funding Inquiry. 16 January 2014. Arlington, VA.

[U.S. DoD] United States Department of Defense Joint Staff. 2013. Joint Publication 3-57. Civil Military Operations. www.dtic.mil/doctrine/new_pubs/jp3_57.pdf [accessed 6 September 2015].

[U.S. DoD] U.S. Department of Defense. 2009. “Department of Defense Instruction. Number 3000.05. September 16, 2009. Subject: Stability Operations”. www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/300005p.pdf [accessed 6 September 2015].

van Buren, P. 2011. We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People. New York: Holt.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-01

How to Cite

Adams, G. (2015). Honing the proper edge: CERP and the two-sided potential of military-led development in Afghanistan. The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.15355/epsj.10.2.53

Issue

Section

Articles